Showing posts with label Henry Cavill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry Cavill. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Man of Steel


I'm going to go out on a limb here and declare this as the best film of the summer. I may even go further and declare this the best superhero film I've seen. This may come as a surprise because critics have not been kind to this film. It currently has a 56% splatter rate on rotten tomatoes, but an 8.1/10 on imdb, which goes to show that critics have completely lost their footing in reality.


One of the main complaints from critics is that the film lacks joy and humour. Man of Steel is directed by Zac Snyder and produced by Chris Nolan, director of the Dark Knight trilogy. Does anyone remember laughing in the Dark Knight films? I don't. And yet no one complained about the lack of humour in those dark films. I think what's happening is that critics have become so used to Marvel's take on superhero films they have come to expect the same from others. In the Marvel universe there is more colour, more humour, more opportunity for some light-hearted banter. With DC things are a little darker, more bleak. Batman's struggles were always as internal as they were external. We had to watch him fall before we could watch him rise. 


In Man of Steel Clark (Henry Cavill) is struggling to align the two sides of himself. He is both alien and human, alien in the sense that he is not of this world, but human in his morality, his connection to the Earth. He is however an outsider, always has been. He uses his abilities to help those in peril, but does so anonymously, hiding his true self in fear of how people will react. Clark may be practically indestructible but he has one very human desire: to be accepted. 


The film is not told in a linear form, rather it goes between present and past, creating an in-depth look at how Clark came to be the man he is today. Like the Dark Knight trilogy, it allows the audience some breathing space, doesn't throw in a lot of exposition and instead lets the story flow in its own way. This means that some questions pondered earlier in the film aren't answered until later, keeping audiences engaged. It sounds like a simple thing, but so few films do this, giving too much away too soon.


Cavill is perfect as Clark. He embodies the man of steel and brings a vulnerability to the role. Amy Adams is refreshing as Lois Lane. She is not overly sexualized and is allowed room to be a character and not just someone the hero has to save. Michael Shannon is at first a little overwhelming as General Zod, but it soon becomes natural to the character. He sure does love to yell a lot. Russell Crowe has a bigger role as Jor-El than I anticipated, and this is a good thing. Kevin Costner is well cast in the role of Jonathan Kent, showing both the fear and pride he feels for his son. 


The score is done by Hans Zimmer and deserves its own review because it's fantastic. With the epic fight scenes throughout the film the score adds tension and emotion, particularly in one scene near the end where, between you and me, there may have been some tears in my eyes. 


I really can't express enough how much you need to a) ignore the negative reviews and b) go see this film. As much as I love the Marvel films, I would be more than happy if superhero films of the future were to become more like Man of Steel. The beauty is that we can have both: the joy and humour of Marvel and the darker journeys of DC characters. It's a big bad universe out there, and there's plenty of room for all. 

Thursday, 15 December 2011

Why Henry, How You've Grown


Back in 2003 a friend and I watched The Count of Monte Christo and we both developed a crush on Henry Cavill who played Albert. He was 20 years old and an unknown actor. I remember trying to look him up on the internet but there wasn't much about him back then. How things have changed.


Today I went and saw him in Immortals. Henry is no longer unknown. He more than proved himself as an actor playing the courageous Theseus. The film is loosely based on the Greek Myths of Theseus, and I don't use the word 'loosely' lightly. If you are a lover of the myths take care, this is very much a Hollywood take on them. When watching the film go for the visuals and battle scenes, not the history.


The film follows Theseus, a bastard son who lives with his mother in a village, which comes under attack from Hyperion (Mickey Rourke), the King of Crete, who is in search of the Epirus bow. Theseus is taken by Hyperion's men and he meets Phaedra, a virgin oracle who can see the future in visions. She can tell that he will be important. With the help of Phaedra (Frieda Pinto) and Stavros (Stephen Dorff) Theseus escapes captivity and they make their way to Mount Tartarus, which is about to be attacked by Hyperion. The gods have been warned by Zeus (Luke Evans) not to interfere but Poseidon (Kellan Lutz), Ares (Daniel Sharman) and Athena (Isabel Lucas) disobey him with tragic consequences.


Immortals is made by the same filmmakers of 300 and the battle scenes are spectacular. It is a gory film so if you're not a fan of blood and splatter perhaps this isn't the film for you. If you are a fan of gorgeous male bodies being put on display then you won't be disappointed.


I thought the story was entertaining, considering how far fetched it all is. Cavill's Theseus is everything a warrior should be: strong, brave and nobel. Rourke's Hyperion is perfectly disgusting. Female roles are always few and far between in stories such as these but it was nice to see Athena kick some Titan ass. The strength of the film lies in the CGI and in Cavill's performance.


Henry Cavill is on his way to becoming one of our generations most recognised actors. His next major performance will be in Man of Steel where he plays Superman. Henry is unknown no more.